🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.